Thursday 22 May 2008

9/11 Part 1: North And South Towers

As I got a bit of criticism about my last post about lack of references (Thank You TF), I have included links at the bottom of each section. If they do not work for any reason, please let me know and I will repair them. Not all references used are online, so in some cases I have used the next best thing. This is Part 1, I will post the rest in stages at a later date.


The events that took place on 11th September 2001 in New York City have gone down in history as a defining moment in recent World history. From that horrific day we have seen two highly-publicised wars in the Middle East, so called “Anti-Terror” legislation both in America and the United Kingdom and many subsequent terrorist attacks in America, UK, Spain, Bali, Egypt and many others. But just how accurate is the “Official” 9/11 story and how many important questions have been overlooked? First off, let us look at the fore-mentioned “Official” story as published in the “9/11 Report”. I have edited it down quite a bit, or this post would take months to read:


On the morning of the attacks, 19 Islamic Fundamentalist hijackers took control of three inland American commercial passenger planes. American Airlines Flight 11 hit the North tower first, followed by United Airlines Flight 175 hitting the south tower. Another plane, American Airlines Flight 77 crashed into the pentagon and finally United Airlines Flight 93 crashed into a field outside of Shanksville, Pennsylvania. The south tower collapsed first at roughly 9:59am after burning for approximately 56 minutes, followed by the north tower at 10:28am. Then a few hours later at around 5:20pm, World Trade Centre Building 7, also known as “The Soloman Brothers Building” also collapsed due to “heavy damage from debris from the collapse of the North and South towers”. The US government announced that the ring leader, Osama bin Laden, had orchestrated the attacks from Afghanistan under the veil of the terrorist organisation “Al-Qaeda”.


Let us look at each part individually before we look at it holistically. This post is Part 1, that looks at the Twin Towers.


North And South Towers


The official explanation for the collapse of the both of the twin towers was the “Pancake Effect”, whereby the jet fuel heated the steel supporting structures causing each floor to fall onto the floor below, causing a domino effect (although it is worth highlighting that a steel-structured building has NEVER collapsed due to fire in the history of the world until 9/11, then 3 collapse in one day. That is pretty remarkable you have to admit).


If you have ever seen the collapse of the twin towers it does look remarkable like a controlled demolition. Even BEFORE the planes hit people inside the towers reported explosions in the basement and sub basement areas. Even fireman, Police Officers, Ambulance Crews and members of the public reported multiple explosions after the impact, and large blasts just before the collapse. Add to this the fact that the architects of the WTC complex designed the towers to withstand MULTIPLE hits from aircraft, yet in less than an hour the temperature had got to such a level it caused the core support beams to melt and buckle causing the collapse. Jet fuel burns at 800 - 1500° F, yet steel melts around 2750° F. When fires burn, if thick and black smoke is coming from the source it shows the fire is starved of oxygen. This would have hindered the fire from reaching its maximum temperature of 1500° F anyway, so unless science is different in New York, there is no way fire could have caused the collapse. But there is one thing that could of though, and that is planted explosives.


Now, I know what a lot of you are thinking, that is impossible. I had the same thoughts, until I looked into it. How could explosives be planted inside multi-billion dollar buildings without anyone noticing, or coming forward to say they were involved? After all, people have a conscious and empathy for others. The explanation given for the cause of the collapse is physically impossible. I am not saying it was 100% a controlled demolition with pre-planted explosive charges, but as Sherlock Holmes famously said “when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth “. And sadly, there is more evidence to support the explosive theory than that of the so-called “Pancake Theory”. And I didn’t even mention the molten support cores, angular-cut support beams, collapsing at free-fall speeds and evidence of thermite explosives.


LINKS:


Video


First Plane Hitting

Second Plane hitting

Collapse Vs Demolition Comparison

Recorded Evidence To Support The Demolition Theory

Computer Animation Showing The Internals Of The Twin Towers


Text


Supporting Official Theory

Suppoting Demolition Theory

No comments: